ࡱ>  Җbjbj 7& 8/RWW"yyyTTTwyyyyyy$JTTTTTyyz"z"z"Tyywz"Twz"z"h nyp> Tj<cȈ0k| Z|xn|nTTz"TTTTTn! TTTTTTT|TTTTTTTTT : WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Regular Meeting of the FACULTY SENATE Tuesday, 31 March 2009 4:00 p.m. Capitol Rooms - University Union A C T I O N M I N U T E S SENATORS PRESENT: L. Baker-Sperry, V. Boynton, L. Brice, J. Clough, L. Conover, K. Daytner, D. DeVolder, L. Erdmann, R. Hironimus-Wendt, V. Jelatis, B. Lee, L. Meloy, L. Miczo, D. Mummert, G. Pettit, C. Pynes, M. Siddiqi, I. Szabo Ex-officio: Ken Hawkinson, Assistant Provost; T. Kaul, Parliamentarian SENATORS ABSENT: C. Blackinton, J. Deitz, L. Finch, M. Hoge GUESTS: Laura Barden-Gabbei, Peter Calengas, Judi Dallinger, Bill Knox, Jennifer McNabb, Leslie Melim, Moises Molina, Nancy Parsons, Phyllis Rippey, Danielle Schilling, Ron Williams I. Consideration of Minutes 10 March 2009 APPROVED AS DISTRIBUTED II. Announcements A. 1. Approvals from the President a. Extension of deadline to fall 2010 for foreign language/global issues requirement implementation 2. Approvals from the Provost a. Requests for New Courses i. PSY 334, Perspectives on Substance Abuse, 3 s.h. ii. PSY 335, Substance Abuse Assessment, Education and Case Management, 3 s.h. iii. PSY 336, Ethics and Special Populations in Substance Abuse Treatment, 3 s.h. iv. PSY 434, Substance Abuse Treatment Approaches and Techniques I, 3 s.h. v. PSY 435, Substance Abuse Treatment Approaches and Techniques II, 3 s.h. vi. PSY 436, Substance Abuse Practicum, 3 s.h. b. Request for Change in Major i. Graphic Communication B. Provosts Report Assistant Provost Hawkinson announced that Provost Thomas could not be present due to his attendance at the Distinguished Faculty Lecture in the Quad Cities. Dr. Hawkinson reported that last week the deans presented their consolidated annual budgets highlighting their accomplishments for the past year, plans for new programs, and budget requests. Provost Thomas will consider all requests, prioritize the items, and present his summary report on April 30. Assistant Provost Hawkinson reiterated that, as Provost Thomas has explained, funding may have to be reassessed in light of current economic realities in order to rein in spending and cover all necessities. Assistant Provost Hawkinson announced that the search for a Dean for the College of Education and Human Services will soon be concluded. Associate Dean Nick DiGrino will act as Interim Dean. Dr. Hawkinson also announced that College of Arts and Sciences Dean Inessa Levi has accepted a position as Provost at Columbus State University. Candidates for Director for the proposed new School of Engineering will be on campus next week. C. Student Government Association (SGA) Report (Danielle Schilling, SGA representative to Faculty Senate) Ms. Schilling announced that SGA elections are currently being conducted for next year. SGA President Rob Dulski and the Student Tenant Union have distributed a Telestars survey to gather information about Macomb apartments. The information gathered will be used to provide information to students about apartment living in Macomb. Taste of Macomb will be held Sunday, April 19 in Chandler Park. Tickets are $1 each, with a various amount of tickets needed for food and activities. SGA will receive 5 cents for every dollar ticket sold, with the remainder going to the providing businesses. D. Other Announcements 1. 2009-2012 Faculty Senate Election Results College of Education and Human Services: Gloria Delany-Barmann, Educational & Interdisciplinary Studies ϲʷ¼QC: Mary Hogg, Communication College of Arts and Sciences: Pat Anderson, Sociology & Anthropology; Netkal Made Gowda, Chemistry; Jennifer McNabb, History At-large: Brian Clark, University Libraries; Phyllis Rippey, Political Science, Mandeep Singh, Marketing & Finance 2. Elections for Senate officers and Committee on Committees representatives will be held on April 14. 3. Petitions are sought from tenured full professors in Arts and Sciences, Business and Technology, and Fine Arts and Communication for the University Personnel Committee. The UPC petition form is available on the Senate website, as is the election notice. One three-year seat is vacant for each of the three colleges. 4. Senators received in their packets a document provided by Illinois Board of Higher Education Faculty Advisory Council representative Steve Rock regarding the Governors Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Proposal. 5. Biology professor Laura Barden-Gabbei asked to speak to senators about an initiative sponsored by Special Olympics to ban the R word, which she told senators refers to retard or retarded. Dr. Barden-Gabbei said an effort is underway to help people recognize the damage that is done to the huge population of people with intellectual disabilities when these hurtful words are used nonchalantly. She noted that calling a child one of these words in many cases does not result in a detention for the speaker as would use of other derogatory words. Dr. Barden-Gabbei said Special Olympics would like to replace the negative R words with a positive R word: respect. 6. PAA Points on Interest Survey Chairperson DeVolder related that a faculty member asked Committee on Committees (CoC) to publish professional achievement award (PAA) points for each council and committee included in the Senates interest survey used by CoC for nominations. The faculty member thought it would be helpful for faculty to know the PAA point values of committees and councils for which they might express interest in serving. Chairperson DeVolder told senators that the Executive Committee was unanimously opposed to publishing this information. He said ExCo noted that Faculty Senate does not enter into any sort of business having to do with contractual issues. Additionally, Chairperson DeVolder pointed out that CoC has a long list of councils and committees that they try to populate; some of these have point values explicitly listed on the PAA form, while others do not, and it is not clear who would assign those point values so that they could be published. He said ExCo also expressed discomfort with faculty using published PAA point values in order to shop for councils and committees on which to serve rather than viewing service as its own reward. Chairperson DeVolder asked for comments from senators before sending a formal response to the faculty member who made the request. Senator Hironimus-Wendt commended the Executive Committee on making the right decision. Senator Siddiqi concurred with the Executive Committee decision, stating that faculty should not engage in service to earn PAA points, but said he would like for the discussion on this topic at the Executive Committee to be included in the Senate minutes so that the larger faculty body can be aware of it: Excerpt from Executive Committee minutes of March 24, 2009: A faculty member asked the Committee on Committees chair to request of the Executive Committee that professional achievement award (PAA) points be posted on future surveys sent to faculty to indicate interest in serving on committees and councils. The Executive Committee expressed their unanimous opposition to including this information on the interest survey. Parliamentarian Kaul pointed out that PAA points are only applicable to Unit A faculty, but Senate positions are open to Unit B faculty as well. He added that PAA points are a contractual item, and Faculty Senate is separate from UPI. Senator Pettit pointed out that faculty can obtain PAA point information on their own for those service assignments whose point values have been published; the others can be worked out by equivalence. The Executive Committees decision will be announced at the Faculty Senate meeting in case there are additional comments or objections. If the decision is acceptable, it will be conveyed to the interested faculty member. Senator Daytner has heard concerns expressed across campus about differing points being assigned for service. She said UPI may need to get involved because there is a perceived lack of fairness in the process. Assistant Provost Hawkinson stated that the commonalities that were agreed to between ϲʷ¼ administrators and UPI when the PAA point system was developed set points for service that could be applied to all faculty in all departments. He said the intention was not to assign a point value to each committee of the University but to cluster similar councils and committees together based upon such factors as number of times each met. Chairperson DeVolder and Senator Boynton remarked that some councils and committees may not meet the same amount of time from one year to the next as some are busier one year and may have less work a subsequent year. Chairperson DeVolder said Faculty Senate would not want to assign point values to the councils and committees to which it appoints faculty only to have to reevaluate those point values in subsequent years. III. Reports of Committees and Councils A. Council on Curricular Programs and Instruction (Nancy Parsons, Chair) 1. Requests for New Courses a. GH 305, Advanced Fine Arts Seminar, 3 s.h. GH 305 APPROVED b. PHIL 440, Legal Reasoning, 3 s.h. When asked about the difference between this course and PHIL 420, Philosophy of Law, Senator Pynes responded that 420 provides students with the philosophical foundations of the general history of law, while 440 will be a more practical logic course dealing with particular kinds of cases. Senator Boynton noted that the request form specifies no relationship to courses in other departments; however, there are several other courses that deal with law. She believes that putting None in this section seems problematic. Dr. Parsons stated that typically CCPI asks for letters of support or some indication that departments with similar courses have been notified of the new course request; she said CCPI would have done so in the case of PHIL 440 but it was not caught by Council members. She agreed that disciplines such as law enforcement, history, and political science offer courses that team with law. Senator Siddiqi remarked that English and Journalism teaches a course in law; he was not consulted about PHIL 440 and did not receive a syllabus to review so cannot say if this course duplicates the offering in his department. Senator Pynes told senators PHIL 440 went through all of the previous levels of review with a proposed new Pre-Law Option attached to it. That option, which is still at the CCPI level, included support letters from Economics, the Honors College, Political Science, Sociology/Anthropology, History, and the Phi Alpha Delta pre-law fraternity. The option also included PHIL 440 as one of its new courses. PHIL 440 APPROVED 2. Requests for New Options a. Geology Earth and Space Sciences Teacher Certification NEW OPTION APPROVED 3. Requests for Changes in Options 1. Geology Dr. Barden-Gabbei explained that formerly the Geology major did not include options. With the addition of the new option in Geology Teacher Certification, the existing major is now the option in Geology. GEOLOGY OPTION APPROVED 2. Music Business MUSIC BUSINESS OPTION APPROVED 3. Political Science General Dr. Rippey explained that the last time the options were revised, greater flexibility and choice was given to Congressional/Executive/Judiciary courses. The department has found through surveying its Senior Seminar course that students were not taking the Political Science core institutional courses. Dr. Rippey explained the option revisions will not change the total number of required hours, but will slightly limit the choices available in order to direct their students back to political science. POLITICAL SCIENCE GENERAL OPTION APPROVED 4. Political Science American Government Senator Pettit noted that if a student were to meet the requirements for the Political Science American Government option, he or she would have also met the requirements for the Political Science General option. He asked if this will be a problem for the department. Dr. Rippey responded that almost all Political Science majors choose the General Option; there are just slight variations in the emphases within the major for each of the four options, with each giving slightly more focus on certain aspects according to their names. POLITICAL SCIENCE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT OPTION APPROVED 5. Political Science International Relations/Comparative Politics Senator Pynes asked what is it about each option that makes it unique from the others since students can satisfy both the specific options and the general option with little difference between the four. Dr. Rippey responded the difference between the General Option and the American Government Option might be the electives that are free for students to choose. Senator Pynes remarked that if students can satisfy the American Government and the General Options at the same time, they would not meet the uniqueness requirement for options in the new definitions of academic terms developed by CCPI and approved by Faculty Senate. Dr. Parsons stated this issue goes back to current discussions at CCPI relating to existing programs, new programs, and grandfathering. She noted that the changes being considered are to existing Political Science options that were created prior to implementation of the definitions of academic terms. POLITICAL SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS/ COMPARATIVE POLITICS OPTION APPROVED 6. Political Science Public Administration/Public Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION/PUBLIC POLICY OPTION APPROVED B. Council on General Education (Phyllis Rippey, Chair) 1. Request for Inclusion in General Education a. GH 305, Advanced Fine Arts Seminar, 3 s.h. SENATOR BOYNTON OBJECTED TO THE COURSE Senator Boynton explained that her objection relates to section C.4. of the Guidelines and General Criteria for Inclusion of Courses in General Education Curriculum, which states: Except for the multicultural category, no 300 or 400-level courses not currently offered (as of Senate approval of the 2007 General Education Review) in the General Education Curriculum shall be considered for inclusion in General Education. Parliamentarian Kaul explained that in order for the request to be considered further, a motion would be needed to restore it to the agenda. Motion: To restore discussion of GH 305 for Gen Ed inclusion to the agenda (Hironimus-Wendt/Baker-Sperry) MOTION APPROVED 17 YES 0 NO 1 AB Dr. Rippey told senators that the same concern raised by Senator Boynton was brought up at the Council on General Education (CGE) meeting at which GH 305 was approved. She said many on the Council felt approving the course was problematic because it is upper division and does not look like a typical Gen Ed course. CGE also noted that GH 305 would not be transferrable under Illinois Articulation Initiative (IAI) guidelines. Dr. Rippey related CGE ultimately decided GH 305 could be grandfathered in; since other upper level Honors courses had been previously approved for Gen Ed credit, she said the Council decided to treat General Honors differently than the rest of the curriculum. Dr. Rippey said she does not defend this decision of the Council, but wished to inform senators that these concerns were also raised at CGE. Senator Baker-Sperry said she does not see how, from the description of GH 305, this is a General Education course. She asked what makes General Education Honors courses different from other General Education courses to justify the fact that GH 305 does not seem to fit with Gen Ed guidelines. Illinois Centennial Honors College Director Bill Knox responded GH 305 was proposed as a Gen Ed course last year with the change in the Fine Arts General Education requirement. He explained the Honors program has a number of 300-level courses that students can use to meet the Gen Ed and upper division graduation requirements simultaneously, and GH 305 would lend itself very well to introducing students to yet another expectation of General Education. He said GH 305 would also lend itself to multicultural experiences that can be shared by the instructor with students through special projects. He asked Faculty Senate to consider approving GH 305 as an exception to the CGE guidelines. Senator Boynton asked for a summary of the discussion on the Honors Council regarding GH 305, its creation and its place in General Education. Dr. Knox asserted the Honors Council thought creation of GH 305 was a good idea. He explained that the Honors College tries to be responsive to the curricular needs and graduation requirements of their students and does not just create new requirements for them, and they thought GH 305 was one way to meet these needs. He stated this course would create opportunities for both students and faculty; he explained that one of the things the Honors College tries to do is to provide a way for faculty to create courses they would otherwise be unable to teach. He concluded GH 305 would enable students to stay within the Honors rubric while meeting their Gen Ed and graduation requirements. Senator Baker-Sperry asked how Honors students would be affected if GH 305 is not approved for Gen Ed. Dr. Knox responded that Honors students would have to take a different 200-level Fine Arts course to fulfill the Gen Ed requirement. He said the Honors College does have faculty interested in teaching GH 305 as a Fine Arts course. He stated GH 305 would empower faculty to do things more honestly than they otherwise could since oftentimes Arts faculty have to teach Honors courses as Humanities rather than as Fine Arts. Dr. Rippey stated this conversation also occurred at CGE, and the only reason that Council accepted GH 305 for Gen Ed credit was because of the precedent of previous 300-level Honors courses in Social Sciences and Humanities. She said because of this precedent, CGE could not find an organizing principal on which to reject the course. Dr. Rippey related the Council came to a consensus that none of the 300-level Honors courses should have been accepted previously for Gen Ed inclusion. She stated the arguments that GH 305 would allow for teaching opportunities and for students to complete graduation and Gen Ed requirements simultaneously did not seem to be good enough to accept the course if the precedent had not already been established. Assistant Provost Hawkinson, speaking as a faculty member who has taught Honors courses, stated his understanding is that the Honors College generally offers unique courses specified for the very bright students in the Honors program. He noted that since Fine Arts and Humanities have been separated in Gen Ed, there are opportunities for students to take an Honors course to meet the Humanities requirement but no Honors courses available for their students to fulfill the requirement in Fine Arts. Senator Boynton pointed out that the CGE guidelines were approved by Faculty Senate and the President in 2007, so they do constitute an official document. Senator Boynton pointed out that in the Relationship to Courses in Other Departments section of the new course request for GH 305, it lists MUS 344 and 390, ARTH 395, HIST 390, 391, and 392, none of which are Gen Ed courses. She remarked this seems to indicate that GH 305 is not parallel to existing General Education courses. Senator Boynton pointed out that Honors students will already be taking courses other than those offered by the Honors College, so she does not see why taking a non-Honors Gen Ed Fine Arts course would be a particular hardship. Dr. Knox agreed that doing so would not be a hardship for Honors students, but being able to take an Honors Fine Arts Gen Ed course would be an opportunity for them. He said such a course may have more interest for the Honors students and would move them along toward their degree. Senator Pynes asked if Honors students have been having trouble finding Fine Arts Gen Ed classes to take. Dr. Rippey remarked that students can take any Gen Ed course for in-class Honors credit. Dr. Knox stated the Honors College is trying to enable students to satisfy Honors requirements and upper-division requirements at the same time. He said the idea was to create another opportunity for Honors students that does not exist currently, noting that there is now an approved course proposal for GH 305 and a faculty member willing to teach it. Senator Baker-Sperry stated that while she served on the Gen Ed Review Committee, the guideline stating that 300- and 400-level courses are inappropriate for General Education was discussed at length. She said the Review Committee discussed multicultural courses in relationship to grandfathering issues, but she can confidently say that they never considered Honors courses, so the 300-level courses that were approved previously were never taken into account at that time. Dr. Rippey stated the University has always appreciated that Honors offers distinguished courses, and no one on CGE thinks GH 305 would not be of high quality. She noted there are some technical issues beyond ϲʷ¼ about what constitutes General Education as articulated by IAI; for instance, multicultural is not an articulated category for IAI. Dr. Rippey related that it was originally thought that the Multicultural Gen Ed category should only include lower division courses that are referred to specifically as multicultural, but it was found that unless the definition was broadened, there would not be enough courses to meet the demand. She stated now, CGE accepts courses with multicultural issues at heart. Dr. Rippey noted, however, there is a problem with including upper division courses in General Education IAI categories. She explained that Illinois community colleges have long argued that they are the General Education colleges of the state; when universities started including upper division courses for Gen Ed credit, community colleges started claiming they should be allowed to teach upper division courses in order to compete. Dr. Rippey related that, in general, four-year institutions opted to discipline their curricula to keep General Education at the lower levels. Dr. Rippey concluded General Education should be introductory courses with no prereqs. Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated Faculty Senate is a unique body with legislative authority as well as executive authority; Senate makes rules and makes decisions that interpret those rules. Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated he would raise the question of whether Honors students are being sufficiently exposed to the general population or whether they are being self-segregated, but that is not the issue in this case. He stated in this particular case, Faculty Senate has to act as an executive body and rule either on the basis of precedent or decide to create an exception to the rules because it serves the broader interests of Honors students. Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated he favors the latter course because he believes there is something unique about the Honors College that transcends the Universitys relationship with community colleges. He said his only reservation is that non-Honors students do not have access to Honors courses. Senator Pynes noted that it is important for Faculty Senate and the University as a body to think about meeting the various needs of the certain types of students ϲʷ¼ attracts, whether they be non-traditional, first generation, or Honors students. He said the University has an obligation to provide the kinds of things that enable its students to be successful, and if it is an unreasonable hardship or even just difficult for Honors students to satisfy the Gen Ed Fine Arts requirement, he does not see why Senate should not make an exception to the CGE guidelines. Senator Baker-Sperry asked if Honors students would be advised that GH 305 would not articulate with IAI, so that if students transfer elsewhere this would not count toward their General Education at another institution. Senator Baker-Sperry stated if Honors is accepted as a distinct entity that is outside the general rule and GH 305 is accepted for Gen Ed inclusion, she would want an assurance that students will be clearly advised that it will not transfer as Gen Ed. Dr. Knox promised to do so. Senator Jelatis stated that if Honors is to be an exception to the CGE guidelines, she would feel more comfortable first redefining the policy and then bringing the request back. Dr. Knox stated the Honors College plans to review its curriculum to make it more in line with University policies, adding he would like to avoid having to ask for exceptions and have a clearer approval process for Honors courses in future. Dr. Rippey stated CGE expressed concerns about how Faculty Senate would respond to future requests that might justify the desire for Gen Ed credit by how it would help their students meet both the Gen Ed and upper division graduation requirements. She said CGE understands why the Honors College wishes for GH 305 to be included in Gen Ed, but asked what makes Honors unique and hoped that an answer would be forthcoming from discussion at Faculty Senate. Senator Boynton asked if the course is 2-3 s.h. or 3 s.h. Dr. Knox responded it will be 3 s.h. Senator Siddiqi asked why the course number could not be changed to 200-level. He observed the CGE Guidelines were developed after extensive discussion and he would not like to see an exception made to the rules. Senator Baker-Sperry noted the statement designed primarily for juniors in the course description is problematic in terms of Gen Ed. Dr. Knox stated he would strike this phrase from the request. Motion: To send the request back to the Honors College and request that they lower the course number and remove the statement indicating the course is designed primarily for juniors (Siddiqi/Boynton) Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated his opposition to tabling the course or sending it back to the Honors College. He pointed out that GH 305 has been approved as a course, so it already exists with that number; he added it also went through the proper channels and was approved by CGE. Parliamentarian Kaul told senators the motion attempts to introduce a different issue; the course needs to be voted up or down. He said if the course is voted down, Senate can then advise the Honors College on a course of action. He reminded senators they have already approved one part of the course, and they are now considering only a component part of it. Senator Baker-Sperry asked if senators would have to approve a motion to create an exception to the existing CGE policy in order to approve GH 305 for Gen Ed credit. Parliamentarian Kaul responded the Senate in its wisdom can say GH 305 can go forward; a revision of the policy could be brought up as a separate issue, but Senate has the power to vote the course up or down for Gen Ed inclusion. Senator Siddiqi asked if the Honors College would consider renumber the course to a 200-level. Dr. Knox responded they would prefer leaving it as a 300-level course in order to keep it consistent with the rest of their curricula. He said reducing the level of the course might inhibit enrollment in it, and he would have to take it back to the Honors Council in order to make that decision. Senator Hironimus-Wendt noted that lowering the course number from a 300-level to a 200-level would require a new course proposal because it would represent a substantive change. Senator Siddiqi stated his opposition to making an exception to the existing CGE Guidelines, saying it does not appear to be logical after spending so much time creating a rule to open a door through which many departments might request future exceptions. Dr. Knox apologized to Faculty Senate, stating that had the Honors Council known about the CGE policy prohibiting new 300-level Gen Ed courses in categories other than Multicultural, they would have not requested Gen Ed inclusion but would have worked in another direction. SENATOR MELOY CALLED THE QUESTION NO OBJECTIONS TO ENDING DEBATE INCLUSION OF GH 305 IN GENERAL EDUCATION FAILED 3 YES 10 NO 4 AB C. Writing Instruction in the Disciplines Committee (Jennifer McNabb, Chair) 1. Request for WID Approval a. Geology Earth and Space Sciences Teacher Certification Option Dr. McNabb explained that WID Committee approval was requested in order for the Geology Teacher Certification option to use GEOL 340 and BIOL 482 to meet the WID requirement. She related the WID Committee examined a host of documents connected with the courses and felt that together they fulfill the eight approved WID guidelines. WID APPROVED FOR GEOLOGY TEACHER CERTIFICATION OPTION 2. Policies and Procedures The WID Committee had not previously had operating procedures beyond those outlined in the Senate Bylaws. WID POLICIES AND PROCEDURES APPROVED IV. Old Business A. Bylaws Amendment Regarding Submission of Petitions for Senate Seats 1. Second reading and vote Proposed amendment to Article II, Section 2. of the Faculty Senate Bylaws: Nominations for members to fill vacancies shall be made by petition. No faculty member shall run for more than one Senate vacancy during each election cycle. At least fifteen members or twenty percent of the eligible college faculty, whichever is less fewer, must sign the petition of a college representative and at least fifteen eligible University faculty members must sign the petition for a University representative. An eligible faculty member may sign more than one petition for that faculty members college representatives and at-large representatives. Motion: To approve the amendment (Pynes/Siddiqi) MOTION APPROVED 17 YES 0 NO 1 AB B. Discussion of Posting Senate Nomination Details Chairperson DeVolder told senators the Executive Committee further discussed whether information regarding nominees for Senate seats should be posted on the Senate website. He related the three members of the Executive Committee each preferred a different option: releasing only number of petitions received, releasing names and numbers of petitions, and no change to the current policy of not releasing the information until ballots are mailed or the nomination process is completed. Chairperson DeVolder stated the Executive Committee recommends that Faculty Senate first vote on whether they wish any change to the current system, and then, if so, which method they would prefer. Senator Siddiqi stated his opinion that the current system is fine with no need for change. Senator Hironimus-Wendt articulated the question is not whether the current system is broken but whether it can be improved, and he thinks it can be. Senator Hironimus-Wendt believes faculty have a right to know who is running for Senate seats, and stated it may help faculty decide if they wish to run against those who have announced their nominations. He believes the more information that is made available, the better. Senator Hironimus-Wendt read from an email prepared by Senator Deitz, who could not be at the meeting due to illness: Ballots should not be surprises, especially when we are discussing election to a representative body like the Senate. There are good reasons why the content of a ballot (names of candidates) should be made public prior to an election. First, voters have time to learn more about the candidates running and to cast the most informed ballots they can. Secondly, those who may consider running should also have as much information as they can to inform their own decisions on candidacy. Contrary to some beliefs, the Faculty Senate does in fact serve an essential political purpose: it is a representative body of the faculty on this campus. As such, the faculty as voters and potential candidates to this body deserve full information on each election cycle, to ensure that the best representation is being provided. Hypothetically, if there were concerns that a set of candidates did not provide the best representation from a college or of the university at-large, it is too late when the ballot is released for other faculty to contest that representation. Keeping this information secret denies faculty the right to fully determine for themselves the best representation for their colleges. Additionally, the practice of releasing the names of candidates who act as representatives of a larger collective is not just a function of politics in the traditional, elected-official sense. For example, the Union (UPI) presents a slate of candidates presented from its nominating committee, and then releases those names and invites others who are interested in running PRIOR to the release of ballots. As a representative body, the Faculty Senate should release the names of candidates seeking to represent various aspects of this university prior to the release of ballots. Faculty deserve to know who desires to represent their college or the university at a time prior to ballot release so that if others are dissatisfied with that representation, they might be able to add additional names to that list. Senator Hironimus-Wendt expressed his agreement with Senator Deitzs statement, and Senator Boynton said she concurs. Senator Brice said Senator Deitzs statement was extremely thorough and he agrees with it fully. Senator Boynton stated the issue is one of fairness: some faculty get a sense of who is running for Senate seats because they are asked to sign a lot of petitions, which would seem to be unfair to those who do not possess this advance information. VOTE FOR CHANGING THE CURRENT SYSTEM OF NOT RELEASING ADVANCE NOMINATION INFORMATION APPROVED 14 YES 3 NO 0 AB Senator Pynes stated when he originally requested information regarding Senate nominees, he was responding to a concern expressed by a faculty member who felt that no Senate seats should be unopposed and who was willing to run to prevent this occurring. Senator Pynes stated he would be happy with just number of petitions received being posted on the website. He believes, however, that if a faculty member is willing to run for Senate, they should be willing to see their names posted early as well. Senator Baker-Sperry questioned the perceived problem with uncontested seats; she explained that faculty run for Senate because they care about service, not because they do not want another faculty member to win a seat. Senator Hironimus-Wendt reiterated his support for releasing the names of candidates as they become available. He said the issue of uncontested elections is not a concern, but he feels knowing the names of candidates provides information he would want to have in order to decide whether or not to run for Senate. He said candidates who submit petitions have already volunteered public information, and 15 faculty members will know of their interest due to signing the petitions. Senator Hironimus-Wendt feels it is important to assess whether the candidates represent his interests or not. Senator Pettit said he is not concerned about uncontested seats, but his constituents have expressed this concern so it is relevant to them. The constituents he conversed with expressed overwhelming support for posting both number of petitions received and names of nominees, so he will vote as directed by his constituent group. Senator Brice said he still supports the statement read from Senator Deitz, and it still applies to this discussion. Senator Boynton agreed. She asked the Recording Secretary if it would be problematic to update names daily as petitions are received in the Senate office; Mrs. Hamm responded it should not be a problem. Senator Meloy stated that ϲʷ¼QC faculty overwhelmingly support releasing candidate names during the nomination period. Motion: To release and make public names of candidates during the petition period of Faculty Senate elections (Brice/Meloy) MOTION APPROVED 14 YES 3 NO 1 AB V. New Business None Motion: To adjourn (Brice) The Faculty Senate adjourned at 5:36 p.m. Gordon Pettit, Senate Secretary Annette Hamm, Faculty Senate Recording Secretary     PAGE  PAGE 12 2BKLSXYZ^dqǽwldYQFhChn CJaJhm=CJaJhCh$ CJaJhHCJaJhChHCJaJhCh11CJaJhCh75CJaJhCh75>*CJaJhCh7#CJaJhCh^CJaJhCh7CJaJh]h:56 hm=56 hC56h]h756 hCh7h]h#5h]h75h]h75>*BYZd      ^ `@&$a$$@&a$ $^a$gd] $ & Fa$gd]    - 9 ? K U a l v      > N ļⱦד׈|tii|taYhCJaJhSGCJaJhCh'H)CJaJha lCJaJhCh75CJaJhChxCJaJh'H)CJaJhChuuCJaJhChPCJaJhChF|CJaJhCCJaJh:CJaJhChCCJaJhCh7CJaJhCh$ CJaJhCh{%CJaJhn CJaJ"N Y j      # % ( ·͐ypgy[PEhChCJaJhChCJaJhCh{.>*CJaJh'H)5CJaJhH5CJaJhCh75CJaJhChPoCJaJh7CJaJhChJCJaJh'H)CJaJhCh7>*CJaJhCh7CJaJhChm=CJaJha lCJaJhn CJaJhChCJaJhCJaJh@(CJaJhSGCJaJ # $ H I PPPPP6 Pp@ P !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I@ ^@ `gd G H I + 0 ~ " % & ' r w (8eҾҾҟҟҟҟҟҟҟ}umumumumuhh,CJaJh+eCJaJhCh}CJaJhCh7CJaJhCh7>*䴳*䴳^䴳*䴳*䴳<>*䴳dd>*䴳<CJaJ* * } " q nVB p@ ^@ `gd*CJaJhChN >*䴳C7>*䴳C>*䴳C7䴳d䴳Cʼ䴳C#䴳C;+䴳䴳;+䴳r䴳+䴳h,䴳< \`0TpP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I`^``gd]G2 Y`0TP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF IgdF< \`0TpP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I`^``gdZOH78eue & F@ 0^@ `0gd* ^`gd*gd8< \`0TpP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I`^``gd:< \`0TpP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I`^``gdv m !#678;de ijtFGUVwlwlwlwlwdldld\Qh*h:CJaJh:CJaJh*CJaJh*h*CJaJh*h*5CJaJh*h*5>*CJaJh*h*>*CJaJh*hOICJaJh*hx >*CJaJh*h1p>*CJaJh*hGx>*CJaJh*hB-KCJaJh*hGxCJaJhCh:CJaJhCh CJaJhJ6CJaJjEFVW !#!$!""" p0^p`0gd*CJaJhw CJaJh_CJaJhICJaJhe{CJaJhWQ)CJaJhWQ)hWQ)>*䴳d䴳6>5*6C6>5䴳*䴳:䴳$䴳&"&&&+'++++++++++,,,,-,--<2 @ ^@ gd gdML gdA gdEVgd'b$ p0^p`0gdw  hp^p`gd7[&&&'**%+&+'+,+N+P+R+U++++++++,+,J,L,ƻ|sg\TH\T@hM@CJaJhML hML 5CJaJhML CJaJhML hML CJaJhML hO"}>*CJaJhA>*CJaJhAhA>*CJaJhACJaJh3~hA>*CJaJhECJaJhChY|CJaJhCh7>*CJaJhCh7CJaJhCh*CJaJh7[h7[CJaJh'b$CJaJhw CJaJh7[CJaJh7[CJOJQJaJL,o,P-Q---- .u.v...8/?///0000_1g1111;2<2=2O2[2s22222223333344 4)4*4K4L444J6K6O6y6ĹĹĢĢКhK!hK!5CJaJhK!CJaJhML ht 9CJaJhML hML >*CJaJhML hML CJaJht 9ht 95CJaJht 9CJaJh.CJaJhw CJaJhM@CJaJhCJaJhML CJaJ6<2=2O2V2t2u2y=< \`0X8@ P !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I@ ^@ `gdML < \`0p@ P !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I@ ^@ `gdML < \`0X8p@ P !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I@ ^@ `gdML  @ ^@ gdu2222222K< \`0p@ P !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I@ ^@ `gdML < \`0X8@ P !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I@ ^@ `gdML < \`0Xp@ P !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I@ ^@ `gdML 233333344)4*4L4M4K6L6y6z666889 V`0Xp@ P !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I@ ^@ `gdML y6z6667888899I9J9b999_;k;;;;<<(=)=N=O=========>E>x>y>~>>Z?[?ҾҪҢҾҾzznhGghGg5CJaJhML hML >*CJaJhML h{CJaJh{5CJaJhGgCJaJh{CJaJhf)BCJaJh{hK!5CJaJh{h{5CJaJhw CJaJh{CJaJhK!CJaJhML CJaJhML hML CJaJhML hK!CJaJ*899J9K9<<N=O===9 V`0Xp@ P !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I@ ^@ `gdML = V`0Xp@ P !$")0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I>@ ]>^@ `gd{ ====>>F>G>y>z>>>Z?[?M@N@@@FAGAmA @ ^@ gdGg gdML 9 V`0Xp@ P !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I@ ^@ `gd{[?M@@@GAmAnACCCCDDSE[EEEFFGGHHHH%J/JKK)M/M|MMMMM NNPRRhSiSjSS`UgUξζƶƶ~vh/TVCJaJhM@CJaJh:CJaJhI CJaJhFQCJaJh{OGCJaJhs3%CJaJhA2CJaJhpCJaJh3CJaJhf)BCJaJhSBCJaJhGghGg5CJaJhGg5CJaJhGgCJaJhGghGg6CJaJ.mAnADDHHKKMMPPiSjSXX'`(`ccffii}k~k|m L@ ]L^@ gdf)B @ ^@ gdGggUVV@VXXZZ[[[[[R\S\\\\^^@_Z_&`'``a acceeffffjjjj|k}k~k/l>m{m|m}mmxnynq[r\rииШh;h;CJaJh;5CJaJhh7CJaJh;CJaJhjCJaJhPCJaJh:CJaJh KCJaJhCJaJh8$CJaJhZDCJaJhz&CJaJhs3%CJaJh/TVCJaJh:CJaJ4|m}mGnHn\r]rvvvvvv%w:w;wpwwwwwww>y @ ^@ gdUq gdML  @ ^@ gd( @ ^@ gd; @ ^@ gdGg\rttuuv$w%w9w:w;w?wowwwww?yuy{yyyz%z&z'z+z7z8z9z>zzzzzø|ph`XhdCJaJh=*CJaJhx CJaJhChZOH>*CJaJhChZOHCJaJhUq5CJaJhUqhUq5CJaJhUqCJaJhML CJaJhML hML >*CJaJhML hML CJaJh(hML 5CJaJh(h:5CJaJh(5CJaJh(hh75CJaJh8$CJaJhh7CJaJ">y?yuyvyyyzz&z'z9z:zzzzzz$}%}V} p^pgdd gdML gdZOH p^pgdUq gdML  @ ]^@ gdUq @ ^@ gdUqzzz5{{{{{#}%}-}W}}}}}}}%)bcـ3AȊԲ떎떎tkbkYkhN1 6CJaJh8$6CJaJh)6CJaJh)hN1 56CJaJh)hN1 6CJaJh8$CJaJhN1 CJaJhML CJaJhML hML >*CJaJhML hML CJaJhd5CJaJhdhd57CJaJhdhd5CJaJhdhdCJaJhdCJaJhdhd>*CJaJV}W}}}~}}}cdklNJȊ89 ^gdN1  gdML p^pgddȊ?lp@BݍΎЎ HLƔ>?@HȰyrnjfhnh9h: hChe>yhCh9>* hCh9hCh=*CJaJh.7h.75CJaJh.75CJaJh.7CJaJhECJaJh8$CJaJhbNCJaJhCCJaJhChGu 5CJaJhChC5CJaJhM@CJaJhGu CJaJh)CJaJ&?@GHIn & F p@ P@&^`P & F@& & F & FgdO & F]^gdp' & Fgd9 gdZOH ]^gd.7:;<=>FGHIN[]dsy–Öɖʖ̖ሄztztpztzeh@(0JmHnHuh4 h40Jjh40JUhIjhIUhChc}jCJaJht2CJaJhChReCJaJhCh:CJaJh:CJaJh7CJaJh.7CJaJh58CJaJh_FCJaJhCh7CJaJh"h hCh7hCh75'nt–ΖϖЖіҖ&`#$ & F p@ P@&^`Pgdt2̖͖ΖЖіҖhCh7CJaJhIh4 h40Jjh40JU5 01h:p'/ =!8"8#$h% ^% h2 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~_HmH nH sH tH @`@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH P@P  Heading 1$ & F @& >*CJaJR@R  Heading 2$ & F@&^5CJ\aJHH  Heading 3$ & F@& >*CJaJJJ  Heading 4$ & F@&5CJ\aJZZ  Heading 5$ & F@&]^5CJ\aJDA`D Default Paragraph FontViV  Table Normal :V 44 la (k (No List XoX Level 17$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X/X Level 4@ 7$8$H$^@ OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X/X Level 3p7$8$H$^pOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X/"X Level 57$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XC2X Body Text Indent ^ >*CJaJ6BB6 Body TextCJaJ4 @R4 Footer  !.)@a. Page NumberXR@rX Body Text Indent 2 & F^CJaJ6U6 Hyperlink >*B*phXSX Body Text Indent 3 & F^CJaJB>B Title$L^La$5CJ\aJFVF FollowedHyperlink >*B* phZYZ  Document Map-D M CJOJQJ^JaJtN1t Body Text First Indent 2 hx^h` >*CJaJ@@ WP9_Title $1$a$5aJh^h Normal (Web)&ddd[$\$]^CJOJQJaJ*W* `Strong5\66 level1!dd[$\$H"H  Balloon Text"CJOJQJ^JaJ$1$ X7objectfBf 6 List Paragraph$d^m$CJOJPJQJ^JaJPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] Ҏ  %%%(N ( mV&L,y6[?gU\rzȊ̖ҖLNOQTWY[\`cegikmo R"<2u228=mA|m>yV}nҖMPRSUVXZ]^_abdfhjln !(!!8@0(  B S  ? jp; B 3 9 j s tw ZaЎӎ.5&,u|u ##$$J6P666N9Z9N:Q:L=R=SM_MJP\P\\ccccrrrr^ujut}}wfv݌čЍЎӎ333333333333333333333333333333Yj4 5 ""J$L$%%u&v&))KKll%w)wxxlp@Bυυ݅ɆɆΆІ HLЎӎYj4 5 ""J$L$%%u&v&))KKll%w)wxxlp@Bυυ݅ɆɆΆІ HLyӎ]FRX6 k#tP|<dGj*9J6 Y'Da$\Tr#%veV'0]:C s+t!F...tjf6_ u9@ Kl`~?"\a N tcP OL pR75s(hkEvT0cxHe.%{i5h^`OJQJo(hHhpp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh ^ `OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!^!`OJQJo(hHhpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh ^ `OJQJo(hHhp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hH0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h p^p`hH.h @ ^@ `hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h P^P`hH.h  ^ `hH.h L^`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHhpp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!^!`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhpp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh!^!`OJQJo(hHh$^$`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh`'^`'`OJQJo(hH ^ `o(.  ^ `hH. xL^x`LhH. H^H`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. X L^X `LhH. ^ `OJPJQJ^Jo(- ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHox^x`OJQJo(hHH^H`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoX ^X `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhpp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!^!`OJQJo(hHh pp^p`hH.h @ @ ^@ `hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h PP^P`hH.h   ^ `hH.h L^`LhH.h $ $ ^$ `hH.h   ^ `hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h dd^d`hH.h 4L4^4`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH. ^ `OJPJQJ^Jo(- ^ `OJQJ^Jo(o x^x`OJQJo( H^H`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o X ^X `OJQJo(h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!^!`OJQJo(hHh$^$`OJQJo(hHh`'^`'`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh0*^0*`OJQJo(hHh$ $ ^$ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhdd^d`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh44^4`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhX^X`OJQJo(hHh(^(`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohh^h`OJQJo(hH88^8`o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!^!`OJQJo(hHhhh^h`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!!^!`OJQJo(hHh\ \ ^\ `OJQJo(hHh,,^,`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohll^l`OJQJo(hHh<<^<`OJQJo(hHh ! !^ !`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh##^#`OJQJo(hHL p'Da$]<\a[.%{kEvF..0Pw0K0cxV' u9*XnNjf6tcr#%k#5s s+p;])9@6 Kl`                                                                                                   ̓N         zΎ                                            vb                                                                       bax@ *Q7=OI7Tyw5nII m, Wj}MYAc&p{]2rFaz{{/55GZgw0&PM^V\P" N1 I $P r < $  ( 0 3 "A Q n hr Iy | E F O yP IV w { w 2$ ?( Gu { V& f& ML 2P `_ (h +z #d%BJYTZ _"yJ*r 9J=\T^n z?/doDx;&>KT_q|" F2;uuMY  "9%GMmtKZ r+wH$b*frv/!K0M NW\anO$hRj~i'(Icu8Mg`pUqz\3CRTdq]Peq&BWk0J6Cxz*119Gkm  7 8 D L k xo X!r!K!!?5!1%s3%{J%O%`%a%q%x%&,&~4& i&x&z&'#'3'A'2R'\'k'p's'w'Y''"<(BI(\(P|(})5)A)C)'H)WQ)~m)**.*/*`*+++"+H&+$,+.+[;+T+qU+iy+4+',W:,PL,u\,.Z.b.We.kf.q.Bu.bx.//A/d/y/S 0 0 70J0t1;1vH1#2L 2'2)6292W<2 Z2t2'y23H3P3]3b3l 4p4r4y45 456>5-B56 6 666&6F,6ie6z6|7#7(7X7h7Zk7pr78;8X81^8f8|8t 9y9v29\9b9Id9 :U::C.:)7:<:@:Tz:;q;V ;D;Y;;8<_<ly<~<"====m=<= >(>g>?(?/?YN?\?c?Zy?,~?+@6@@L@qAA#A,ACAAMA Bf)B&PBGZB[BfBjuB~zBCdC<+C>CnPC'bC%fC/lC DH D8VDZD]D)gDjD}DEEo EaEjbEYFO FF9F3FOHF_FbFKG{OGEcG]fG gGiGjGs)HGHZOHIII2IP5IFIdIrIJ J JJ*J0JBJeJmJ K*KB-KFKGK&L|.LLL)_LslLw{LMM)My?Md|M N N4NbNsNOnO^qOrO]P P2PSLP)QE&Q:QAQFQMQRPQaQtQzQR RH&R'ReMRqMRTRZmRzRSaJS\SiS T T9T+=TKVT]T oTUUUUhU=U|YUiUapUZrUV2VEV/TVvVWGWOWC=W??W XFXXXcX\Y#YKY#QY`YrY Z)Z1Z*wZzZp[[[-[0[7[KK[\,\Z9\;\W;\A\S\]\n\|\]]> ] "]C]*I]_]e]n ^(^P]^v_}_/>_@_B_qS_a_`]8`?`.L`GZ`"]`q` a@a:alalzaQbbNbIHbdbfbob$cPgcdAdyTdXd*bdhd3jdPe,e6eFeRe_e;fVf3cf g /gjoPjkjc}jF~j kk@.k-;k!Dkckruka llHlf:lUlZlMmlul1"mO*mG0m^mym` nn0n>nknn$o,ohDoPo;Vooo2rop1p+:p];p*Sp1epFrp( qq0Dq/KqVqaqhqjqlqrprzrG?r8ss,s\s=tt"tt'tTBtHt\t^tbt uU$uvveuvQ w ww"JwyRw0]wDxGxSIxexy y'!y 'ye>yARyhy zrzzJz_zozwzC {z.{;A{3M{+[{c{e{3|v@|F|O"}|,}7}i`}@t} ~~~3~*:~!=~u~l|~#'j4B"Hk?<H]hk?Y"7;]GsJi=g6V{*:-DAG}x1BOZw^xg -,K8}y7A=QNou'+ 059J ]i#0EY+]*_DlH!X`k&s+G2Je*i~=* 39;\]g4u EwMc*gmvY|r p5?QijlU{|%2ck` !()/5:Bn 8"Q)B/Y8:OACDO_6d,(r[I8O\Paanq:FMQV^ #/N6\sr i w%c-<@B#Xau{}'ANUdHlp:"08qw}x.2Km0x6 w"5$2XQf UA "DQ&{ mIj%sgzd.79:cB0FF^vx !@HZco;ELdikTPctt .I'R^feb&(BTEp|D},<`\Is)1NVdu >iq+B@ILik7{e&4>Temg"4*?J-xp}"=)rbG;CEJS^ikz4Ofrt| v,658C` rACKLy` iU I|=PKlTZbN'/ G=HfPa.JVx i%45?ac ,A2V<>JqN(},?O^d ; CRXr *#2}9FH\sd# ,b5n%}_(3P[,$/0Q:Qb~ (FI{T0 }+*,;^plJ"@(DlHl)nx'jIel805@Bc,c_aa+e {#V+54NFeqbvz ![03t5s:FMdr3"*`#y#`5 BWqhr{. O.k/6H?@CpkQMiZ>7#?(7.7D,O  2d A> SZhyN V&<@$CCaQNb0y~W# 0/=[aVi$HXo ~X6w?FIWAdx6 :O^_?kp[t{.L]RT{} +L SB/IGgj177r}q)#<@FPNNg$v-EAjvru&&CNhP=\@UVe xxx:Gq  /J@i\cJ4<:?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnoprstuvwxz{|}~Root Entry F0%? Data q1TableyWordDocument 7SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8MsoDataStore> p> JUDQR23Q==2> p> Item  PropertiesUCompObj y   F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q